IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION
Case No. 18-CH-11439
Set Date: March 23, 2021
Judge Cecelia Horan
A. R. MARTIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE JUDICIAL SALES CORP,
et al.
Defendants.
PLAINTIFF’S VERIFIED PETITION FOR
SUBSTITUTION OF JUDGE HORAN FOR CAUSE
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-1001 (A)(3), Plaintiff petitions the
Court for substitution of Judge Cecelia Horan and states:
1. Background
During a primary election for the United States Senate, Plaintiff asked Representative Mark Kirk to address questions about his sexuality. There were recordings on the Internet which made homosexual accusations against Kirk. (Plaintiff did not accuse Kirk of homosexuality, he pointed to the recordings by third parties, see text of ad attached as an exhibit).
The left-wing media and sexual activists directed a torrent of abuse and misinformation against Plaintiff, all at a time when Judge Horan was a very active sexual advocate. Attached is a single article which details the episode. The episode drew national attention by left-wing media and was featured in the same local gay media that supported Judge Horan’s career.
2. Prior discrimination by a lesbian judge in the Daley Center
Plaintiff previously appeared before a lesbian judge in the Daley Center; the corruption and abuse of authority by the judge were overwhelming. Thus, Plaintiff experienced how gratuitous bias is directed against him by sexual activists for reasons having nothing to do with the merits of his legal claims.
3. Judge Horan’s special status as an activist
If Judge Horan was a private person before ascending the bench, one would be less suspicious of her as a neutral adjudicator. But Judge Horan has been an activist, seeking to bend the court system in Illinois and particularly Cook County to her views, however they are characterized. Every article about Judge Horan, including one by the Illinois State Bar Association, highlights her lesbian activism, see attached.
Thus, it is especially likely she was aware of the Mark Kirk/Plaintiff fracas and the retaliation against Plaintiff by the homosexual community. Plaintiff stresses he has no animus against any homosexuals, it is they who have attacked Plaintiff, not Plaintiff who has attacked them.
A decade ago, plaintiff was merely campaigning for transparency, not hatred or hostility. He was gratuitously attacked even though his accusations of sexual abuses in the office of Speaker of the U. S. House were later confirmed (Dennis Hastert, pedophile; Rep. Mark Foley, sexual predator; sexual abuse of House pages). Plaintiff also exposed Kirk’s fraudulent military claims. In effect, gay activists attacked Plaintiff to suppress the truth, not because he published lies or false information.
4. Judge Horan’s anti-American activism
In addition to her lesbian activism, apparently after being appointed a judge, https://www.windycitytimes.com/m/APPredirect.php?AID=62160, Judge Horan agitated against national security and secure borders and worked to endanger Americans by allowing unrestricted access to the United States. Thankfully, the U. S. Supreme Court rejected her views.
Nevertheless, it is increasingly clear that the Cook County judiciary and the Daley Center has become a cesspool of judicial corruption (backroom deals for appointment of judges) and agitation against secure borders and national security. Plaintiff does not believe he can obtain justice or a fair hearing before an anti-American judge.
Conclusion
Given Judge Horan’s status as a lesbian activist and anti-American activist and given Plaintiff’s interaction with Mark Kirk, and strong support for national security and America’s borders, the appearance of bias is overwhelming and Plaintiff cannot obtain a fair hearing before Judge Horan.
Verification
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to § 735 ILCS 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters the undersigned certifies as aforesaid he verily believes the same to be true.
__________________________
A. R. MARTIN
DATED: March 18, 2021
Respectfully submitted,
A. R. MARTIN
Plaintiff’s Tel. (347) 960-9593
Plaintiff’s Fax (866) 214-3210
Plaintiff’s email: andymart20@aol.com
Plaintiffs’ mailing address:
A. R. Martin
National Litigation Center
300 Burns Street
Forest Hills, NY 11375-6133
Certificate of Service
I certify I have served the defendants with this document on March 18, 2021, as follows:
Jonathan.Lippner@cookcountyil.gov
ALeMar@burkelaw.com,mlieberman@noonanandlieberman.com, MeredithPitts@hsbattys.com, jherbas@fisherandshapirolaw.com,
ccc.chancerycalendar9@cookcountyil.gov,gg@dracolaw.com,
geopolis6@yahoo.com,vidasbutkus@yahoo.com,
_______________
A. R. Martin
Campaign Against Corruption in Illinois federal/state courts 